[BIOSAL] Travis and failure

[Boisvert, Sebastien]

I merged your changes.

> From: George K. Thiruvathukal [gkt at cs.luc.edu]
> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 10:03 PM
> To: Boisvert, Sebastien
> Cc: biosal at lists.cels.anl.gov
> Subject: Re: Travis and failure
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Well, suffice it to say, with the nanocommit model, I feel like I got a lot done today.
> See below.
> 
> 
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 7:30 PM, Boisvert, Sebastien 
> <boisvert at anl.gov> wrote:
> 
> I pulled your branch. Thanks.
> 
> > temporarily modify a test
> >  to fail so I can ensure that the error code propagates back to make, and it was successful. Oddly, make is returning 2 when only 1 is returned by run-unit-tests.sh.
> 
> This is make that is returning 2 when there were errors.
> 
> 
> 
> ​Yes, of course. I totally had forgotten about the make error semantics. It all makes sense! That's why people should RTFM.
> 
> ​
> 
> 
> From "man make":
> 
> EXIT STATUS
>        GNU make exits with a status of zero if all makefiles were successfully parsed and no targets that were built failed.  A status of one will be returned if the -q flag was used  and  make  determines
>        that a target needs to be rebuilt.  A status of two will be returned if any errors were encountered.
> 
> 
> 
> ​Yes!
> 
> ​
> 
> > Will look into this further, but I did confirm that when all tests pass, I get 0 as the result
> >  of make test.
> 
> Perfect !
> 
> 
> 
> ​FYI, I have also pushed out a number of nanocommits for you. This includes the scripts to run examples, application tests, and a few more items as Chief .gitignore Officer.  We've now got *.log and *.junit.xml on our .gitignore list. I did not break these
>  out into nanocommits, because it's abundantly clear we don't want either ever going into a repository.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Well, before I mess something up, i had better call it a night. :-) I'm looking forward to working on the next version of distributed hello. Then I should be well on my way to the systolic array. Things are really starting to make sense.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> George
> 
> 
>