[BIOSAL] Results with Xeon and Xeon Phi

[Boisvert, Sebastien]

New result on Xeon Phi 7120A: 3.8 M messages / s

biosal version: 07353e8af5d5db5be41faa5578cf25c917df6cad

boisvert at jenny-mic0:~$ ./latency_probe -threads-per-node 122 |tee log-122
boisvert at jenny-mic0:~$ grep COUNTER log-122
PERFORMANCE_COUNTER type = ping-pong
PERFORMANCE_COUNTER ping-action = ACTION_PING
PERFORMANCE_COUNTER pong-action = ACTION_PING_REPLY
PERFORMANCE_COUNTER node-count = 1
PERFORMANCE_COUNTER worker-count-per-node = 121
PERFORMANCE_COUNTER actor-count-per-worker = 100
PERFORMANCE_COUNTER worker-count = 121
PERFORMANCE_COUNTER actor-count = 12100
PERFORMANCE_COUNTER ping-message-count-per-actor = 40000
PERFORMANCE_COUNTER ping-message-count = 484000000
PERFORMANCE_COUNTER pong-message-count = 484000000
PERFORMANCE_COUNTER message-count = 968000000
PERFORMANCE_COUNTER elapsed-time = 253.761957 s
PERFORMANCE_COUNTER computation-throughput = 3814598.580832 messages / s
PERFORMANCE_COUNTER node-throughput = 3814598.580832 messages / s
PERFORMANCE_COUNTER worker-throughput = 31525.608106 messages / s
PERFORMANCE_COUNTER worker-latency = 31720 ns
PERFORMANCE_COUNTER actor-throughput = 315.256081 messages / s
PERFORMANCE_COUNTER actor-latency = 3172024 ns

> From: Fangfang Xia [fangfang.xia at gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 03, 2014 3:47 PM
> To: Boisvert, Sebastien
> Cc: biosal at lists.cels.anl.gov
> Subject: Re: [BIOSAL] Results with Xeon and Xeon Phi
> 
> 
> This interesting. I’m curious what the call stacks for these spin locks are?
> 
> On Nov 3, 2014, at 3:35 PM, Boisvert, Sebastien <boisvert at anl.gov> wrote:
> 42.42%
>   [kernel]                          [k] _spin_lock    
> 
> 
>